by JussiH » Tue Feb 17, 2015 1:51 pm
Something is wrong, thats for sure.
Pls post the XML file and the full output. And tell us which version of the quatos tool was used to calc the profile.
You have the TX cube defined 18 cm to the right of the origin with a mass of 80 grams. That should create a right side imbalance (that side is heavier), that should show up as as higher roll thrust numbers...
But instead it looks to me like the Quatos tool perceived that the TX cube was 18 cm behind the origin - in which case the result is correct and more pitch thrust is beeing allowed on the rear motors to compensate for a tail-heavy craft.
Bill, Srinath, Max:
This looks oddly familiar.....NED on craft and ENU in quatostool? The output is inconsistant with the XML, so something is going on....can you take a look, pls.
Thanks
Jussi