Have anyone tried on a H4 Frame

[wangyeee]

I've tried to mount my M4 on a F450 frame, but it turned that M4 doesn't work well on that frame. No matter how I tune the PID, it oscillated with high frequency. So I decide to get a new frame for my M4.
The H4 frame is foldable which makes it easy to travel with. And there is enough space to install everything inside the frame. It's made of 1.5mm carbon fiber and 16mm CF tube. The motor-to-motor distance is 680mm. I want to know if anyone has tried AQ on similar frames, and how does it work?

[aBUGSworstnightmare]

Well, I don't know that frame, but I've tried - and still love them - a similar frame (also in size). But, my tubes are 25mm CF.

One is made of GFK and uses PID control (viewtopic.php?f=38&t=2920), the other one is using QUATOS controller and is made of CFK (1.5mm, viewtopic.php?f=38&t=3958)

A flight video of the CFK version with QUATOS is here:


In general:
- AQ likes STIFF frames (for low vibration levels)
- AQ likes HARD mounting (no rubber standoffs etc.)

--> were to find more pics of that frame? looks a little flexible ...

[wangyeee]

[brat002]

Just buy Naza. It will be more cheaper than lot of crashed on not recommended frames.

[aBUGSworstnightmare]

[wangyeee]

[aBUGSworstnightmare]

You should start with the default Quad-X mixer. When the craft flies you can try and change it. Was not satisfied with a custom mixer on my PID CamCruiser --> reverted back to quad-x