How does AQ know when it is absolutely leveled?

[LordPikaChu]

[JussiH]

Dynamic looks fine to me.

In my experience Mag magnitude can not be used to gauge calibration quality since its not an absolute and will vary with environment and outside influences.

Once you have made the calibration and uploaded the params, try and go back to the place where you did the calibso and turn the craft 360 on each axis. If the log shows ranges of approximately +/- 2.0 on all 3 axises you are in good shape.

[LPR]

Mateusz

You have done a lot of work but finding a complete solution is not easy. I know you want to move the board away from the power wires but using tall standoffs will add vibrations to the AQ board. Vibration can be worse the mag interference.

Larry

[LordPikaChu]

[Trnquill]

[LordPikaChu]

[Trnquill]

[JussiH]

There was a change in PID scaling from 6.7 to 6.8. So if you fly with your old params, that might explain the problems.

As for mags, I´d say that noise levels up to around +/- 0.5 is ok. But I usually see noise floor around 0.2 or lower in my builds.

For Acc, the noise level should be lower than +/- 2 for a good result. But I have had it as high as +/- 5 and still been able to fly good. When you begin to approach nose levels around +/- 10 on ACC, you are very close to saturation.

If I was you, I would take a good look at each propellor and motor. The kind of problems you describe could be associated with thrust mismatch on 1 or more actuators. Recent tests by teammembers seem to indicate that even socalled High Quality props can be mismatched. If you have a wattmeter, you can use that to compare the power on each actuator, but the best to do is to make a thrust measuring device and measure actual thrust at 10, 25, 50 and 100 percent duty (use the "duty" command in the esc cli)

[bluuu]

As I sad many times - default PIDs are acurate for quads. For bigger setups (like hexa) in most cases we must lowered PIDs (especialy Tilt Angle D and Tilt Rate D and PIDs for Pos/Alt Hold).

[Trnquill]