@Joebar : true, but it´s not obvious for a newbie that starts with AQ what things are defined inside the AQ code or in the QGC (I saw it was defined in the AQ code). In this case I thought that the Rx selection was done at QGC level (a kind of interpreter) not in the AQ code, but I was wrong.
I think WIKI should be always a compromise between sinthetic-but-complete information and excesive info. And this is a difficult selection cause the users has wide expertise levels: from very low to very high. You can kill a lot of potential users simply by this (the wiki approach).
Angel